Page 40 - economic review
P. 40

MACRO ECONOMIC PROFILE12

                               District-wise Per Capita Income

                                  1.24	 Growth rate at current prices does not eliminate the inflationary impact. When district level
                                  growth rate at constant prices, is compared the “real” NSDP growth rate may be observed as the
                                  inflationary impact has been eliminated. Table 1.5 reveals that the districts of Kasargod, Kozhikode,
                                  Thrissur and all the southern districts viz. Thiruvananthapuram, Kollam, Pathanamthitta, Alappuzha
                                  had higher real growth in NSDP than the State Average. However, the districts of Wayanad, Kollam,
                                  Palakkad and Idukki showed lower growth in per capita income than the state average.

                                  1.25	 The analysis of district wise per capita income shows that Ernakulam district stands first
                                  with the per capita income of ` 86267 at constant (2004-05) prices in 2013-14 as against ` 81557
                                  in 2012-13. The district wise per capita income with corresponding rank and growth rate is given in
                                  Table 1.4

                                                     Table 1.4

                               District-wise Per Capita Income at constant (2004-05) Prices

                          Sl.          District      2012-13  Rank  2013-14  Rank               Growth
                          No.                           (P)            (Q)                      Rate (%)
                        1
                        2      Thiruvananthapuram    63003          4 67299                  4        6.82
                        3                                                                             7.75
                        4      Kollam                51934      10 55960                     9        7.07
                        5                                                                             7.02
                        6      Pathanamthitta        64930          3 69518                  3        4.54
                        7                                                                             2.05
                        8      Alappuzha             57941          7 62006                  6        5.78
                        9                                                                             7.06
                        10     Kottayam              66531          2 69555                  2        5.49
                        11                                                                            4.59
                        12     Idukki                59058          5 60269                  7        6.32
                        13                                                                            5.55
                        14     Eranakulam            81557          1 86267                  1        5.30
                                                                                                       7.11
                               Thrissur              58429          6 62554                  5        5.96

                               Palakkad              48879      11 51561     11

                               Malappuram            33685      14 35230     14

                               Kozhikode             52176          9 55474  10

                               Wayanad               43690      13 46113     13

                               Kannur                53536          8 56372                  8

                               Kasaragod             45787      12 49041     12

                               STATE                 55643          58961

                                           Source: Department of Economics and Statistics P: Provisional Q:Quick

                        1.26	 Table 1.4 reveals that the districts Ernakulam, Thrissur, Kozhikode, Pathanamthitta,
                        Thiruvananthapuram, Malappuram, Kannur and Kasrgod had a much higher growth rate than
                        the average growth in per capita income in 2013-14. However, the districts of Wayanad, Kollam,
                        Palakkad and Idukki showed lower growth in per capita income than the state average.

                        1.27	 District wise and sectorwise analysis of GSDP reveals that Kollam district showed highest
                        contributions in primary sector and Ernakulam district contributions in secondary and tertiary sectors
                        are highest. District-wise sectoral distribution of Gross State Domestic Product from 2011-12 to
                        2013-14 at current and constant (2004-2005) prices are given in Appendix 1.17 to Appendix 1.22.

                        Kerala State Planning Board
   35   36   37   38   39   40   41   42   43   44   45